Ninth Circuit rejects defendant’s challenge to border search conducted pursuant to suspicion that defendant was violating U. S. immigration laws by escorting illegal aliens from Korea to Hawaii on false passports


Ninth Circuit rejects defendant’s challenge to border search conducted pursuant to suspicion that defendant was violating U. S. immigration laws by escorting illegal aliens from Korea to Hawaii on false passports
On October 19, 1999, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) detained two individuals trying to board a flight to Honolulu from Guam International Airport when they were unable to answer an INS officer’s questions. Upon review, the officer discovered that their Taiwanese passports were photo substitutions, and that their legal names were He and Chen.
Further investigation turned up the fact that the two had stayed at a Guam hotel that was paid for by the credit card of one His Huei Tsai. Arrival flight records showed that Tsai was a passenger not only on the flight He and Chen were trying to board, but also on the flight He and Chen had taken to Guam. No other passenger was present for both flights. The INS inferred that the three had been traveling together and that Tsai was aiding and abetting He and Chen in their effort to enter the U.S. illegally.
Upon the flight’s arrival at Honolulu airport, an INS officer stopped Tsai as he deplaned. A search of Tsai’s valise turned up an airline ticket jacket with the names “Cheng Wen Ping” and “Chang Ching Hsueh” inside: the names that appeared on the fraudulent passports of He and Chen. Interrogation of Chen revealed a collaborative alien smuggling plot in which Tsai and a female escort, using the name “Jessica Huang,” had initiated a three-legged journey for He and Chen. First, the aliens flew from Saipan to Seoul with Ms. Huang, using the corporate credit card of a company called “La Marie Co., Ltd.” Tsai’s wife ran this company, using her husband’s address in the State of Georgia as its business address. The aliens stayed in a Korean motel room for several weeks, until Tsai appeared to escort them to Guam. The final leg of the journey was to consist of the flight from Guam to Honolulu.
Authorities also found airline vouchers for a Yee Khong Lim and Gaik Choo Tan in Tsai’s carry-on luggage at Honolulu airport. From Tsai’s credit card statements, and Chen’s testimony, the INS concluded that Tsai had escorted Lim and Tam from Saipan to Honolulu one month earlier, in exactly the same fashion as he had done with He and Chen. Further investigation uncovered a similar plot that enabled a fifth alien to travel to Atlanta on a stolen South Korean passport, using the name Ji Yeong Yun.
The Guam district court found Tsai guilty on three counts of escorting unauthorized aliens into the United States for financial gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. Section 1324(a)(2). Tsai appealed, alleging, inter alia, that the INS search of Tsai’s effects at the Honolulu airport was unlawful. He argued that the INS inspector knew that the government suspected Tsai of criminal activity in Guam, and therefore he had improperly conducted the search for a specific investigative purpose.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms. The Court views the Honolulu airport as the “functional equivalent” of a land-border, with respect to searches of international air travelers. The INS search of Tsai was only minimally intrusive, since it probed no further than his valise and carry-on luggage.
When the law requires a search warrant, its scope applies in a broad and general manner. When the law removes the need for a search warrant, e.g., for border searches, it rescinds it in an equally broad manner. The Court is unwilling to conclude that the customary, non-invasive, warrantless search endured by Tsai would be permissible for every other passenger excepting those under suspicion by the INS of taking part in criminal activity. The searching officer had reasonable cause to suspect that Tsai was aiding and abetting aliens in their attempts to penetrate the borders of the U.S. illegally. He also had grounds to believe that Tsai had thereby rendered himself ineligible to enter the U.S.
Citation: United States v. Tsai, 2002 WL 338230 (9th Cir. March 5, 2002).

*** Magdalena Cuprys is the principal of Serving Immigrants, a full-service immigration law firm offering a complete range of immigration services to both businesses and individuals. The law firm is uniquely qualified to manage the most contentious and unusual immigration needs. Swift resolution of immigration-related issues is integral to a client’s ability to conduct business or reach their personal goals in the United States. Located in Miami and Clewiston, the firm’s offices provide corporate and individual clients of foreign nationality with temporary work permits for the U.S., green card petitions, criminal waivers and representation in removal proceedings cases. With over a decade of experience, the law firm provides clients with the confidence that their cases will be handled by an expert who understands their needs and how to obtain their goals. Although the majority of the law firm’s clients live in Florida, it represents people from all over the United States and several foreign countries.

Magdalena Cuprys, Immigration Attorney, Blog

Florida immigration attorney Magdalena Cuprys obtains release on reduced bond for detained Bangladesh citizen who has a pending “battered spouse” petition

Magdalena Cuprys, Esq., Immigration Lawyer, Florida Upon Motion for Bond Redetermination, Immigration Court in Florida releases cli...

Recent Posts